A Comparative Study to Assess the Level of
Depression among the Elderly Residing in Old Age Home and with the Family
Mr. Amaya M. Khande1, Mr. Gururaj Udapi2
1Senior
Tutor, K.L.E. University’s Institute of Nursing Sciences, Belgaum, Karnataka.
2Asst
Professor, K.L.E. University’s Institute of Nursing Sciences, Belgaum,
Karnataka.
*Corresponding Author Email: ameyguruji@gmail.com
ABSTRACT:
A
Comparative study was conducted to assess the level of depression among the
elderly residing in old age home and with the family.
Depressive
disorders are the most common affective illness found in old age. Depression is
a mood disturbance characterized by exaggerated feelings to sadness despair, lowered
self esteem, loss of interest in former activities and pessimistic thoughts.
The incidence of increased depression among the elderly is influenced by the
variables of physical illness,
functional disability and cognitive impairment.1
A non
experimental comparative research design was adopted to carry out the present
study. Probability simple random sampling by using lottery method technique was
used to select 100 samples i.e. 50 elderly clients residing in old age home and
50 elderly clients staying with the family. Data was collected by means of a
Standardized Beck’s Depression Inventory (BDI) Scale which was divided into 2
sections which consisted socio-demographic variables and variables to assess
the level of Depression.
The
major findings indicated that the level of Depression among the elderly
residing in old age home were severe to moderate and elderly residing with the
family had mild to moderate level of depression, and there is no significant
association between Depression, with selected demographic variables at 0.05
level of significance, except age in years of elderly residing in old age home.
KEY WORDS: Elderly, Depression, Old age
home, Family.
INTRODUCTION:
“Age' is the acceptance of a term of years. But maturity is the glory of
years”.
-- Martha Graham
Aging
is a normal, universal and inevitable change which takes place even with the
best of nutrition and health care. It is a time related change that occurs
throughout life. Aging involves all aspects of the organism and largely
characterized by a decline in functional efficiency and decreased capability to
compensate and recover from stress.
As an individual advances from
infancy to old age he accumulates a wealth of impression, skills and knowledge
and develop his own life style”.2
Ageing is inevitable. It is
irreversible, progressive and is associated with decline in functions. The
individual gradually becomes dependent physically, functionally, socially and
economically. Elders usually exhibit multiple health problems with complex
interactions. The most common chronic conditions affecting older adults are
cardio vascular diseases, cancer, diabetes, osteoarthritis, Alzheimer’s disease
and psychiatric disorders, like depression and dementia. 3
WHO
Report on
aging and Health reported that in developed countries approximately 1 to 3%
of people aged over 65 suffer from severe depression with further 10–15%
suffering milder forms of depression.
Higher suicidal rates are associated with undiagnosed rates of
depression. 25% completed suicides are above 65 years. Suicide rates for depression in men over 65 –
85 times higher than for younger men. Although the actual levels in developing
countries are not known precisely since it requires age and culture relevant
measures of depression.
In India the situation has
reached alarming proportions from 25.6 million in 1961. The number of those over 60 years is expected
to touch 340 millions in 2061. Between
1961 and 2061 while the total population would five times, the number of the
elderly would soar 13 times. Today India
is home to over 70 million older people.
Of this around 34 million, are elderly women, more than half of them are
widowed. The majority of older people
resides in rural Indian and is denied the specialized and social services that
may be available to their urban counter parts. While only 7 million older
people belong to the organized sector, the rest are the part of the unorganized
sector and as a result have no provisions made for old age. Further the aging issues are still not
considered to be as important as issues like child labor or women’s
development. 5
NEED FOR THE STUDY:
The world’s elderly population
in the last 50 years from 1950 to 2000 had increased from 8% to 9.9% of total
population respectively. The geriatric population at present is 30.2% of total
population of 313 million. The proportion of elderly population is expected to
increase from 9.5% in 1955 to 14.6% in 2025.0f these more than 50% of them
would be living in developing countries. It is estimated that by the year 2020,
700 million elderly will be in developing countries, currently there are around
671 million elderly in the world with China being the highest of them with the
population of 12 million and Russian Federation with the lowest population of 3
million in the world scenario. It is also projected that by 2020 the Japanese
population will be the oldest in the world with 31 % over 60 years of age
followed by Italy, Greece and Switzerland.
6
India is one of the South East
Asian countries, in India by the year 2001 there were around 76 million elderly
people, who constituted 7.7% of the country’s population. Currently there are
around 82 million elderly people, who constitute 9.8% of country’s population
with Kerala constituting the highest population of 3,33,668 which is 10.5% and
Arunachal Pradesh with the lowest population count of 50,000 which is 4.5% It is expected to increase further to 14%
which will be 171 million by 2025.7
In Karnataka out of the
population of 5.5 corers (8%) are elderly citizens. In Belgaum the total
population ranges from of 30-32 lacks out of which 82,346 people are elderly
which is 36.43% with highest population in Gokak Taluka
with 15171 (8.4%) and lowest with Khanapur Taluka i.e. 1036 (1.7%). 8
Depression will increase in
magnitude as the elderly population increase year by year. Hence there is need
for considering the emotional states of elderly when they treated for any of
physical problem in the hospitals, homes, or in primary health centers. Later
life depression can have serious repercussions in increasing mortality and disability,
health care utilization and longer hospital stays, yet 63% older adults with a
mental health disorder experience an unmet need for mental health service.
Deteriorating health, a sense of isolation and hopelessness and difficulty
adjusting to new life leads to depression and which in turn leads to suicide.
Elderly have no other option but to live in old age homes, often face
loneliness, alienation and depression. In addition to losing most of their
worldly possessions and social support, they also lose their privacy and their
sense of self worth. They need others to meet their emotional and recreational
needs. Depression is the most common disturbance of mood experienced by
elderly. It is a pathological mood disturbance characterized by feelings, attitudes
and beliefs the person has about self and his environment, such as pessimism,
hopelessness, helplessness, low self esteem and a guilt feeling.4
Hence investigator feels that
depression may sometimes be hidden behind an array of vague symptoms and it becomes
necessary to carefully assess the elderly to identify marked depression to
treat the person holistically. This will enable health care professionals in
preventing the psychological problems and controlling the problems related to
depression. Mild levels of depression can be identified and treated in time to
prevent it before it becomes severe.
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM:
A comparative study to assess
depression between elderly residing at old age home and with families in
Belgaum city, Karnataka.
OBJECTIVES:
The objectives of the study are:
1. To assess depression among the
elderly residing at the old age home.
2. To assess depression among
elderly residing with the families.
3. To compare depression between
the elderly residing at the old age home and with the families.
4. To find the association between
depression among the elderly residing at the old age home with demographic
variables.
5. To find the association between
depression among the elderly residing with the families with demographic
variables.
OPERATIONAL DEFINITION:
1.
Assess: In this study assess refers to a statistical measurement of
depression among old age by using Beck’s Depression Inventory.
2. Elderly: In
this study Elderly
refers to men and women aged between 60-75 years.
3.
Old age homes: - In this study an old age home is a
multi-residence housing facility intended for the elderly.
4.
Families: A group of people related in
heredity or marriage and those living in the same household who are emotionally
attached and interact regularly with each other.
HYPOTHESIS:
1. H1: There will be a significant
difference between depression among elderly residing at old age home and with
families.
2. H2: There will be a significant
association between depression among elderly residing at old age home with
selected demographic variables.
3. H3: There will be a significant
association between depression among elderly residing with families with
selected demographic variables.
ASSUMPTIONS:
Old age people may be at risk
for depression.
The environmental factors may
play a major role in determining psychological well being of old age people.
The environmental factors may
enhance positive or negative mental health among old age people.
DELIMITATION:
The study is delimited to elderly clients who are
above 60 years of age.
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY:
Research
Approach:
A comparative
approach was adopted in this study.
Research Design:
A non experimental
comparative research design was adopted to carry out the present study.
Research
Setting:
Based
on the geographic proximity, feasibility to conduct the study and familiarity
with the setting, the investigator selected old age homes and families in
selected areas of Belgaum City, Karnataka.
Population:
The population of the present
study comprises the elderly residing in old age home and those staying with the
families in selected areas of Belgaum City, Karnataka.
Sample and
Sample Size:
Sample size of the present study
consists of 100 elderly clients (50 elderly staying in old age home and 50
elderly staying with the families from selected setting) Belgaum, who are able
to read, write and understand Kannada, Marathi and English.
Sampling
Technique:
The sampling technique used for
the present study is Simple Random sampling which is a type of Probability
sampling technique and was considered appropriate for the study.
Description of
Tool:
The tool used for gathering
relevant data was a Standardized Beck’s Depression Inventory (BDI).
The final tool consists of two
sections;
|
Section I |
: |
Demographic data |
|
Section II |
: |
Standardized Beck’s Depression
Inventory (BDI). |
Beck’s
Depression Inventory is made up of 21 multiple choice self report items to be
completed over ten to twenty minutes, each reflecting a negative emotional
symptom. Each of these is rated with
scores ranging from 0-3 on the severity of the participants' experiences over
the last week with the intention of emphasizing states over traits. These
scores ranged from 0, meaning that the client believed the item "did not
apply to them at all", to 3 meaning that the client considered the item to
"apply to them very much, or most of the time". It is also stressed
in the instructions that there is no right or wrong answers. The sum of the
relevant 21 items for each scale constitutes the participants' scores for each of the emotions leading to Depression. The
tool was translated in Kannada and Marathi and retranslated back to English by
language experts.
PLAN
FOR DATA ANALYSIS:
The data obtained was analyzed
in terms of the objectives of the study using descriptive and inferential
statistics. Experts in the field of nursing and statistics directed the
development of data analysis plan which is as follows:
a. Organizing data on a master
sheet.
b. Tabulation of the data in terms
of frequencies, percentage, to describe the data.
c. Classifying the levels of
depression, anxiety to Beck’s Depression Inventory (BDI) interpretation.
|
SR.NO |
SCORES |
INTREPREATION |
|
1. |
1-10 |
These ups and downs are considered
normal. |
|
2. |
11-20 |
Mild mood disturbance. |
|
3. |
21-30 |
Moderate depression. |
|
4. |
31-40 |
Severe depression. |
|
5. |
Above 40 |
Extreme depression. |
CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK:
The conceptual framework of the present study is based on general
system model of Lindwing Von Bertalanffy
(1969). 9
RESULTS:
Findings related to socio demographic variables.
Table no 1: Frequency and percentage distribution of Elderly clients residing in old age home according to demographic variables. n=50
|
S No. |
Socio-demographic variables |
Frequency (f) |
Percentage (%) |
|
1 |
Age in years. |
|
|
|
|
a. 60-65 years. |
15 |
30 |
|
|
b. 66-70 years. |
28 |
56 |
|
|
c. 71-75 years |
07 |
14 |
|
2 |
Gender. |
|
|
|
|
a. Male. |
32 |
64 |
|
|
b. Female. |
18 |
36 |
|
3 |
Religion. |
|
|
|
|
a. Hindu. |
34 |
68 |
|
|
b. Muslim. |
9 |
18 |
|
|
c. Christian. |
5 |
10 |
|
|
d. Others. |
2 |
4 |
|
4 |
Marital Status. |
|
|
|
|
a. Single. |
10 |
20 |
|
|
b. Married. |
31 |
62 |
|
|
c. Divorced. |
07 |
14 |
|
|
d. Widow/widower. |
02 |
4 |
|
5. |
Number of
children. |
|
|
|
|
a. 0-1 |
12 |
24 |
|
|
b. 2-3 |
33 |
66 |
|
|
c. 4 and above |
5 |
10 |
|
6. |
Admission to old
age home |
|
|
|
|
a. Voluntary. |
34 |
68 |
|
|
b. Involuntary |
16 |
32 |
|
7. |
Duration of stay
in old age home. |
|
|
|
|
a. Less than 1 year. |
12 |
24 |
|
|
b. 1-2 years. |
30 |
60 |
|
|
c. 3-4 years. |
5 |
10 |
|
|
d. Above 4 years. |
3 |
6 |
|
8. |
Performance of
activity. |
|
|
|
|
a. Independent. |
13 |
26 |
|
|
b. Partially dependent. |
30 |
60 |
|
|
c. Completely dependent. |
7 |
14 |
The data presented in table 1 indicates
that,
v Maximum Elderly clients 28 (56%)
belonged to 66-70 years of age group and minimum 07 (14%) of them belonged to
71-75 years of age group.
v Majority of Elderly clients 32
(64%) were male and while a minimum 18 (36%) were female candidates.
v Majority of the Elderly clients
34 (68%) belonged to Hindu religion while minimum 02 (4%) belonged to the group
of other religion.
v Majority of the Elderly clients
were married 31(62%) while minimum 02(4%) belonged to the group of
widow/widowers.
v Majority of the Elderly clients
33 (66%) had 2-3 children while the lowest group 05(10%) had above 4 children.
v Majority of the Elderly clients
34 (68%) were admitted to old age home on Voluntary basis while minimum 16(32%)
were admitted on Involuntary basis to old age home.
v Majority of the Elderly clients
stayed in old age home since 1-2 years 30(60%) while minimum of 03(6%) stayed
in old age home above 4 years.
v Majority of the Elderly clients
30(60%) carried out their activities of daily living with partial dependence
were as minimum of 07(14%) of them carried out activities with dependence.
Table no 2: Frequency and percentage distribution of Elderly clients staying with the family according to demographic variables. n=50
|
S No. |
Socio-demographic variables |
Frequency (f) |
Percentage (%) |
|
1 |
Age in years. |
|
|
|
|
a. 60-65 years. |
13 |
26 |
|
|
b. 66-70 years. |
32 |
64 |
|
|
c. 71-75 years |
05 |
10 |
|
2 |
Gender. |
|
|
|
|
a. Male. |
28 |
56 |
|
|
b. Female. |
22 |
44 |
|
3 |
Religion. |
|
|
|
|
a. Hindu. |
41 |
82 |
|
|
b. Muslim. |
5 |
10 |
|
|
c. Christian. |
3 |
6 |
|
|
d. Others. |
1 |
2 |
|
4 |
Marital Status. |
|
|
|
|
a. Single. |
12 |
24 |
|
|
b. Married. |
34 |
68 |
|
|
c. Divorced. |
03 |
6 |
|
|
d. Widow/widower. |
01 |
2 |
|
5. |
Number of
children. |
|
|
|
|
a. 0-1 |
15 |
30 |
|
|
b. 2-3 |
31 |
62 |
|
|
c. 4 and above |
4 |
8 |
|
6. |
Performance of
activity. |
|
|
|
|
a. Independent. |
13 |
26 |
|
|
b. Partially dependent. |
30 |
60 |
|
|
c. Completely dependent. |
7 |
14 |
The data presented in table 2 indicates
that,
v Majority of Elderly clients 32
(64%) belonged to 66-70 years of age group and minimum 05 (10%) of them
belonged to 71-75 years of age group.
v Maximum Elderly clients 28 (56%)
were male and while a minimum 22 (44%) were female candidates.
v Majority of the Elderly clients
41 (82%) belonged to Hindu religion while minimum 01 (2%) belonged to the group
of other religion.
v Majority of the Elderly clients
were married 34(68%) while minimum 01(2%) belonged to the group of
widow/widowers.
v Majority of the Elderly clients
31 (62%) had 2-3 children while the lowest group 04(8%) had above 4 children.
v Majority of the Elderly clients
33(66%) carried out their activities of daily living with partial dependence
were as minimum of 06(12%) of them carried out activities with dependence.
Section III: Analysis and Interpretation of depression scores of
elderly residing in old age home and with family.
Table 3: Mean median, mode, standard deviation and range of
depression scores of elderly residing in old age home and with family
n = 100
|
Area of analysis |
Mean |
Median |
Mode |
Standard deviation |
Range |
|
Residing in Old
age home. Residing with
Family. Difference |
30.74 20.88 9.86 |
31 21 10 |
31.52 21.24 10.28 |
3.04 2.00 1.04 |
6 6 0 |
Table 3 reveals that mean
difference is 9.86, median is 10, mode is 10.28, standard deviation is 1.04 and
range difference is 0.
Comparison of level of depression among elderly residing in old
age home and with the family showing
Graph 1. Line graph showing Mean, Median, Mode, Standard Deviation
and Range of Depression Scores of Elderly residing in Old Age Home and with
Family
Graph 2: Bar Graph showing
classification of depression scores of elsedrly
residing in old age home
Graph 3: Bar graph showing classification of depression
scores of elsedrly staying with family.
Table 3: Frequency and percentage distribution of depression
scores of elderly residing in old age home. n= 50
|
Level of
depression |
Score range |
Frequency |
Percentage (%) |
|
Ups and downs are normal. |
1-10 |
0 |
0 |
|
Mild mood disturbance |
11-20 |
0 |
0 |
|
Moderate depression |
21-30 |
22 |
44 |
|
Severe depression |
31-40 |
28 |
56 |
|
Extreme depression |
Above 40 |
0 |
0 |
Table
no 3 depicts that maximum of elderly clients 28 (56%) had Severe depression and
22 (44%) had Moderate level of depression.
Table 4: Frequency and percentage distribution of depression
scores of elderly staying with the family.
n= 50
|
Level of
depression |
Score range |
Frequency |
Percentage (%) |
|
Ups and downs are normal. |
1-10 |
0 |
0 |
|
Mild mood disturbance |
11-20 |
22 |
44 |
|
Moderate depression |
21-30 |
28 |
56 |
|
Severe depression |
31-40 |
0 |
0 |
|
Extreme depression |
Above 40 |
0 |
0 |
Table
no 4 depicts that maximum of elderly clients 28 (56%) had Moderate level of
depression and 22(44%) had Mild level of depression.
Testing of Hypothesis
Section V: Comparison and Evaluation of depression scores of
elderly residing in old age home and with the family.
H1: There will be a significant
difference between depression among elderly residing at old age home and with
families at 0.05 level of significance.
H2: There will be a significant
association between depression among elderly residing at old age home with
demographic variables at 0.05 level of significance.
Analysis and Interpretation of data to
find out an association between depression scores of elderly residing in old
age home with demographic variables.
Table 5: Association between depression scores of elderly residing
in old age home and demographic variables. n=50
|
S.No |
Socio
demographic variables |
Good |
Average |
Poor |
χ2 CAL.VAL |
χ2 TAB
VAL |
df |
|
1. |
Age in years. a. 60-65 years. b. 66-70 years. c. 71-75 years. |
1 1 3 |
14 27 4 |
0 0 0 |
9.82 |
9.49 |
4 |
|
2. |
Gender. a. Male. b. Female. |
2 3 |
30 15 |
0 0 |
0.52 |
5.99 |
2 |
|
3. |
Religion. a. Hindu. b. Muslim. c. Christian. d. Others. |
3 2 0 0 |
31 7 5 2 |
0 0 0 0 |
2.29 |
12.592 |
6 |
|
4. |
Marital Status. a. Single. b. Married. c. Divorced. d. Widow/widower. |
1 3 0 1 |
9 28 7 1 |
0 0 0 0 |
4.32 |
12.592 |
6 |
|
5. |
Number of children. a. 0-1. b. 2-3. c. 4 and above. |
1 4 0 |
11 29 5 |
0 0 0 |
0.73 |
9.49 |
4 |
|
6. |
Performance of activity. a. Independent. b. Partially dependent. c. Dependent |
1 3 1 |
12 27 6 |
0 0 0 |
0.19 |
9.49 |
4 |
|
7. |
Admission to old age home. a. Voluntary. b. Involuntary. |
4 1 |
30 15 |
0 0 |
0.35 |
5.991 |
2 |
|
8. |
Duration of stay in old age home. a. Less than 1 year. b. 1-2 years. c. 3-4 years. d.
Above 4 years. |
2 3 0 0 |
10 27 5 3 |
0 0 0 0 |
1.46 |
12.59 |
6 |
χ2-chi
square, df – degrees of freedom
Table 6: Mean difference (d), standard error of difference (SED)
and un- paired ‘t’ values of depression scores of elderly residing in old age
home and with the family n = 100
|
Mean (X1) =30.74 Mean(X2)= 20.88 |
Standard error(S2 ) |
Un-Paired ‘t’ Values |
|
|
Calculated |
Tabulated value at 98 degrees of freedom |
||
|
|
6.62 |
19.33* |
1.960 |
*(p<0.05)
Table 6 reveals that the
calculated Un-paired ‘t’ value (t=19.33) is greater than tabulated value
(t=1.960). Hence H1 is accepted.
Table 7: Association between depression scores of elderly staying
with the family and demographic variables. n=50
|
S.No |
Socio
demographic variables |
Good |
Average |
Poor |
χ2
CAL.VAL |
χ2 TAB VAL |
df |
|
1. |
Age in years. a. 60-65 years. b. 66-70 years. c. 71-75 years. |
2 8 3 |
9 20 1 |
2 4 1 |
4.51 |
9.49 |
4 |
|
2. |
Gender. c. Male. a. Female. |
7 6 |
17 13 |
4 3 |
0.02 |
5.99 |
2 |
|
3. |
Religion. a. Hindu. b. Muslim. c. Christian. d. Others. |
11 2 0 0 |
24 2 3 1 |
6 1 0 0 |
3.51 |
12.592 |
6 |
|
4. |
Marital Status. a. Single. b. Married. c. Divorced. d. Widow/widower. |
2 10 0 1 |
7 21 2 0 |
3 3 1 0 |
6.68 |
12.592 |
6 |
|
5. |
Number of children. a. 0-1. b. 2-3. c. 4 and above. |
3 9 1 |
8 19 3 |
4 3 0 |
3.24 |
9.49 |
4 |
|
6. |
Performance of activity. a. Independent. b. Partially dependent. c. Dependent |
2 7 4 |
6 22 2 |
3 4 0 |
7.56 |
9.49 |
4 |
The findings of table 5 reveals
that the variables age in years, gender, religion, marital status, number of
children, admission to old age home, duration of stay in old age home and
performance of activities of daily living among elderly residing in old age
home are independent of each other. The chi-square calculated value is less
than the chi-square table value, reject the hypothesis. Hence there is no
association between depression scores and demographic variables.
Analysis and Interpretation of data to find out an association
between depression scores of elderly staying with the family with demographic
variables.
H3: There will be a significant
association between depression among elderly residing with families with
demographic variables.
The findings of table 7 reveals
that the variables age in years, gender, religion, marital status, number of
children, and performance of activities of daily living among elderly staying
with the family are independent of each other. The chi-square calculated value
is less than the chi-square table value, reject the hypothesis. Hence there is
no association between depression scores and demographic variables.
DISCUSSION:
The results were
supported with the study by Dr. G. Radha Krishnan, A
study to assess depression among general out patients attending selected
general hospital. This study reveals that 86.8% of
the subjects fell in the age range of 61.43 were married 25.72 from urban
background.5 Another study by Ather M Taqui, Ahmed Itrat, Waris Qidwai, et al. Depression
in the elderly: Does family system play a role? A cross-sectional study showed
that 65 to 74years, 78% were male, 21.2 were married.6
In the present
study revealed that among 50 elderly clients residing in old age home, 28 (56%)
had severe level of depression and 22 (44%) had moderate level of depression.
Among 50 elderly clients staying with the family, 28 (56%) had moderate level
of depression and 22(44%) had mild level of depression. The results were
supported with the study by Bekaroglu M, Uluutku N, Tanriover S, Kirpinar I, revealed
that around 41% of the elderly clients residing in the old age institutions had
severe depression were as compared to elderly residing in the home 29% had mild
depression.7 The results were also supported with the study by M C Dougall FA and Matthews FE, revealed that around 27.1%
elderly residing in old age home had depression were as compared to the elderly
staying with the family 9.3% had low level of depression.8
CONCLUSION:
The nurses play an important
role in prevention of geriatric depression. Nurses enhance peoples’ ability to
deal with the multiple factors that influence their health status and health
care needs. The goal of nursing is to promote health, prevent illness, restore
health and alleviate suffering. The nurses have an impact on the health and
life of societies in every imaginable situation providing solutions and
touching the human heart.
The study showed varied levels
of depression, among elderly residing in old age home and with the family. The
results of the study will help the nurses to understand the level of
depression. The investigator as a mental health nurse felt that the nurses are
ideally placed to implement proactive strategies to prevent depression, to
promote early detection of symptoms and to ensure access to effective treatment
in older people. Mental health nurse have a key role to play in providing the
appropriate psychological, spiritual, social and physical support that can lead
to improvement in quality of life for the older people.
This study will enable the nurses
to prepare teaching guidelines for prevention and management of depression.
Thus, nurses can build good health of the community by providing information
which will help them to manage depression among elderly clients and also
prevent occurrence of depression.
REFERENCES:
1.
Christensen Kockrow. Foundations and
adult health nursing. 1st ed. Philadalphia:
Mosby Company; 2006.Pg.no:1082, 1088.
2. Lessy. F. Jarvic.
Aging into the 21st century.
New York: Garner Press; 1988. Pg.no:231.
3. Karensaucer , Sharyn
Janes, K..Lundy Essentials of community based
nursing. 1st ed. Canada: Jones and Barlett
publishers. 2003. Pg no: 502, 504,509,525.
4.
WHO Report on Aging and
Health; 2003.Pg.no:19 to 21.
5. Gulani K K.
Community health nursing principles and practices. 1st ed. New Delhi.
Kumar Publishing House. 2005. Pg no: 469-471.
6. Park K. Text book of preventive
and social medicine. 8th ed. Jabalpur, India. Banarasidas Bhanot Publication.
2007. Pg no: .382.
7. The Belgaum District Statistical
Information Booklet 2009-2010. Page no: 50-52.
8. Bimla Kapoor
Text book of psychiatric nursing. Ist ed. New
Delhi. Kumar publishing house. 2005. Pg
no: 272-275.
9.
Toukala M. The General System model of Lindwig Von Bertalanffy.
Available at: http//www. (nekos.org/engjournals/ The
general system model of Lindwig Bertalanffy.doc .
10.
Radha Krishnan. A study to assess depression
among general out patients attending selected general hospital at Belgaum,
Karnataka, Nightingale Nursing times 2006 2(2). Pg.no:
29-32.
11. Ather M Taqui,
Ahmed Itrat, Waris Qidwai et al. Depression in the elderly: Does family system
play a role? A cross-sectional study. BMC Psychiatry. 2007 Oct 25; 7: 57 Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2194680/
12. Bekaroglu M, Uluutku N,
Tanriover S, Kirpinar I. Department
of psychiatry, Faculty of medicine, Karadeniz
Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey. Acta
Psychiatric Scand. 2001 Aug; 84 (2). Pg.no: 174 –
178.
13. M C Dougall
FA and Matthews FE. Prevelance and symptomatology of depression in older people living in
institutions in England and Wales. Age aging 2007. Sep 36(5). Pg.no: 562-568.